Hutchison celebrates three decades of supporting the innovation economy to help build what’s next. Learn more

View All Blog Posts

What Founders Really Need to Know About Raising Capital in 2026

Startup fundraising has never been a clean, linear process, and founders who have actually lived it will tell you it’s equal parts strategy, storytelling, and grit. In a recent episode of the Founder Shares podcast, moderated by Hutchison corporate partner Anna Tharrington, three North Carolina-based founders shared hard-won lessons from their own capital-raising journeys. Robin Cowie of Skillmaker, Isaac Park of Keebler Health, and Lucy Shores Kosturko of Social Cascade collectively represent dozens of investor conversations, multiple funding rounds, and over $27 million raised. What they’ve learned challenges some of the most common assumptions early-stage founders bring to the table.

The Story You Tell Investors Is Not the Story You Tell Customers

One of the most counterintuitive insights from the panel is that the pitch founders make to investors must be fundamentally different from how they talk to customers. Robin Cowie, whose background spans filmmaking, a bootstrapped exit, and now an AI-powered training platform for automotive technicians, put it plainly: what a company sells to its customers is very different from what it sells to investors. Customers need to understand the immediate pain being solved. Investors need to believe in the vision at scale, specifically what the business looks like in one, two, or five years. Isaac Park reinforced this by noting that the investor narrative evolves with each funding stage: at pre-seed, the team and thesis matter most; by the seed round, traction and forward momentum take center stage; and by Series A, the conversation shifts almost entirely to competitive differentiation and market defensibility. Understanding which story belongs in which room is a skill founders develop over time, and one that pays dividends at every round.

Fundraising Process Is a Discipline, Not an Instinct

The mechanics of how founders run their raise matters as much as what they’re raising for. Isaac Park described building a list of approximately 150 individual partners (not just firms, but the specific decision-makers), conflict-checking each one, mapping warm introduction paths, and launching coordinated outreach tranches of 20 to 30 contacts per week. The goal was to create simultaneous momentum across multiple prospects, ultimately generating competing term sheets. His team’s first raise, by contrast, lacked this structure entirely, a fact their earliest investor later pointed out with candid bluntness. That process discipline also came with a real personal cost: during active fundraising rounds, Park estimates he was essentially working two full-time jobs simultaneously, adding 30 to 40 hours per week on top of running the business. The takeaway for founders is practical and sobering. Begin building the process infrastructure months before the raise officially starts, because the window for errors is narrow and the margin for distraction is zero.

Non-Dilutive Capital and Ecosystem Partnerships Are Underutilized Advantages

While most early-stage founders fixate on venture capital, Lucy Shores Kosturko of Social Cascade built her company’s foundation on a different strategy altogether, one that ultimately made the venture conversation easier. When the fundraising landscape tightened dramatically in 2022 (just as Social Cascade was ready to raise), the team pivoted to bootstrapping, applying for non-dilutive grants including SBIR awards, and participating in accelerator programs. The result was significant ARR momentum, a stronger narrative, and a seed round led by Symphonic. Kosturko’s advice to other founders is direct: treat non-dilutive grant applications like a shots-on-goal system rather than a high-stakes bet on any single award. The first application is hard; the process becomes more efficient with each subsequent one. She also challenged founders to think differently about accelerator programs, not as early-stage necessities to outgrow, but as ongoing sources of network access and warm introductions to well-connected investors. In a climate where, as Kosturko noted, roughly 75% of Q1 2026 VC funds went to just five funds and a handful of startups, access to ecosystem relationships may matter as much as the pitch deck itself.

The Best Companies of the Next Decade Are Being Built Right Now

Despite an objectively difficult fundraising environment, all three founders closed the conversation with something that felt less like obligatory optimism and more like hard-earned conviction: the constraints of a tight capital market make better companies. When money is difficult to raise, founders are forced to get precise about what their business actually does, who it serves, and why it matters. Robin Cowie pointed out that the barrier to building technology has never been lower, meaning AI adoption alone is no longer a differentiator, and founders must lean harder into what AI cannot replicate: trust networks, proprietary relationships, and compounding customer value. Isaac Park noted that historically, the most successful startups have emerged from difficult funding vintages precisely because those conditions imposed discipline. And Lucy Shores Kosturko, perhaps most succinctly, captured the opportunity in the constraint: the people with clarity have never had more leverage. For founders willing to do the work, building the process, refining the story, and tapping every non-dilutive resource available, the path forward is genuinely promising.

The blog content should not be construed as legal advice.